Archive for June, 2009

North Korea: What’s the deal?

This morning a terrified woman called me about her proposed vacation to Hawaii.

“If there’s going to be an attack,” she said, “maybe I’ll go. But I need to know so I can leave my daughter at home.”

I intern at a Congressman’s District Office, writing letters, stuffing envelopes, answering the phone.  I have no security clearance even in the building where his office is located. So what am I supposed to tell this woman about defense and American foreign policy? I’m an international relations major, sure, but I’m not going to pretend that I can predict the future of East Asia.

Defense Secretary Robert Gates says we’re capable of defending against a missle attack against Hawaii. The real danger of a missle attack is the ensuing chaos — waves of panic as tourists and native Hawaiians alike scramble to flee the islands in anticipation of a second missile that could carry a nuclear warhead.

Hawaii would no longer become a happy place to vacation or live if it became apparent that North Korea was actually capable of sending its Taepodong-2 missles that far. Stability in East Asia would disappear overnight. Chances are Japan would nuclearize in response to a Korea that’s willing to attack. 

Those consequences seem so much more vast than one woman worrying about cancelling her trip — and I really had no idea what to tell her. I gave her the public DoD and Homeland Secuirty numbers, and begged her to exercise good judgement. I told her that I, personally, would not put my child in that situation. Yet Hawaii isn’t exactly North Korea’s goal; The likelihood of anyone dying is super low given North Korea’s track record of sucking at missles, it’s outdated equipment, and an implicit understanding that if it does something that brash and stupid, East Asia, Russia, the United States will all follow with real force. The real concern, at least as I understand it, is that those missles that could potentially reach Hawaii would be sold to other countries whose enemies are much closer — Iran being the key example. We know North Korea has sold nukes in the past.

Her solution: go to the Bahamas instead.

Sounds like a great solution, unless you live in Hawaii. (Sorry, Angelie)

Leave a Comment

Federalism and You: What You Need To Know

The most commonly overlooked aspect of American government is that laws are separated by locality. It seems obvious to us when we think about traffic laws, gun laws, or age of consent — but when we need help, that distinction never seems to cross our mind. When people have a problem with government, they go to the government. But people often aren’t approaching their issue at the right level of government — namely, people contact the federal government regarding problems over which the federal government has little to no jurisdiction.

Here’s one quick question that people can’t seem to answer consistently: If you have a problem with the Texas Workforce Commission, who do you call?

The answer is obvious — and in the name. You call Texas government, because the organization is run by Texas.

So what makes so many Texans think that federal government (namely members of Congress) will be able to help you solve a problem handled by the Texas government?

One conversation I had when redirecting a constituent to his State Represenative went roughly so:

“Sir, the Texas Workforce Commission is a Texas agency. I can redirect you to your Texas State Senator and Representative, who may be able to help you.”

“Well I contacted them already… but I thought maybe if you got Charlie (Rep. Charles Gonzalez, D-TX) to bring out the big guns, things might get done faster.”

“I can take note of your complaint, but it would be inappropriate for the Congressman to step outside of the limits of his office.”

“Well let him know, I’m sure when he hears this he’ll get on it. You know, I met his father…”

Seriously? Is this how uneducated the citizenry is? I get calls about City Public Service, local/state crime (those incarcerated in state detention facilities love contacting US Congressmen to ask for pardons), neighbor complaints, and all sorts of bizarre things that have nothing to do with the federal government and probably never will (despite complaints that we’re becoming some sort of socialist state, we enjoy remarkable freedom of self-government).

The next time you want to call an official, think: on of what level of government does your agency sit?

Then call.

Leave a Comment

Contacting Congress: Are You a Constituent?

Calling one’s congressperson is for obvious reasons the most effective way to participate in American political discourse. Yet with each Representative representing some  500,000-600,000 constituents, it’s necessary to keep a realistic (not pessimistic) perspective on how much your opinion can affect policy. There are a couple of obvious things — if your congressperson is not middle-of-the-road, asking him to transgress party platform lines is not going to change his opinion. Additionally, responding to legislation that has already passed means you’re too late right off the bat. Does that mean you should’t call? No. You should call even if you will not get your way, because that is how you are heard, and that is how we know that constituents are not complacent.

By far the worst sin concerned Americans make when taking action is calling the congressperson of a district in which they have not established constituency. Reasons for doing so include ignorance, and more justifiably, calling regarding a committee. However, there are a number of tools to help you check constituency; here in San Antonio we usually use the Bexar County election’s homepage because the vast majority of misdirected calls are due to changing district lines.

That is no excuse. If you are calling because you want to know who your congressman is, that’s fine, and we’re more than happy to get you where you need to go. Otherwise, it’s time to go back to government class.

America is a Representative Democracy.

If you are not a constituent of a congressperson, they do NOT represent you. They are not obligated to listen to you just because you pay taxes. Individuals with limited sight get pissy and tell all of their friends when I explain to them that their taxes go toward their own representative. You don’t vote for 434 of 435 Representatives, and you don’t vote for 48 out of 50 of United States Senators. They really don’t have to care about you outside of the possibility that you might come campaign against them — and that’s a job done by party organizations, anyway.

That isn’t to say there aren’t times when it is totally appropriate to contact other congressmen — but it’s worth knowing that nine times out of ten, you’re going to get redirected back to the office you should really be calling.

Comments (1)

Working for Congress

I’m working for Representative Charlie Gonzalez (TX-20) at his District Office in San Antonio. Thus, I found material for this blog!

From now on, you’ll see posts about interning in a Congressional Office interspersed with political commentary coming from that perspective.

1pt[1]

I’m small game in the political world (if you can call answering the phone and writing letters participation), but I this is an important perspective — not from the outside in, or from the inside out, from from the bottom up.

Leave a Comment